SEO: propaganda, naive optimism and realism
Refer a means to communicate.
Communicate in order to attract the barge on a treadmill after which there is a cash register.
Much like the slaughter of livestock if it should attract the animal to be able to handle it.
Bookmark is organizing convoys of potential customers.
That use channels of the Web (in real recycled ions) to refer to the user what they want more or less awkwardly to find happiness.
His happiness at home, of course:)
Bookmark is making its own promotion, as a sigh: making eyes gentle, be at its best.
That seduce.
Or show a buddy incompetent in its best profile, as does Cyrano for Christian de Neuvillette.
Excellent référenceur, Cyrano!
This analogy daring (pardon, sir Rostand) to show that I do not like the SEO carpet merchants.
Hey! They should be spared now they think seriously to form associations:)
You see me they are not a trial for having dealt with large p * tes robots to say then?
That is why I am presenting things in a more sensitive:)
Bookmark is lying just by exalting the qualities, omitting defects.
Or lie more in stuffing the skulls as it is in politics or in the wholesale business in shares.
Although policies, issue Web, they are nowhere, it is sad but I will talk another time.
I shall draw it Médiocratie and plutocracy: France politics on the Web.
As for big business to share… thin, I would have already forgotten the crisis of mortgages in the USA?
All of these powerful, all these are big nullissimes and it is we who pay eventually.
It would therefore that, the trick?
Lather (reference) étron for that buys and shooting with the cash?
After Rostand, a seat at Audiard:)
Propaganda its declination webbistique referencing is a subtle way of presenting things engines.
It is also the art of lying robots despite the guidelines issued.
It is legitimate because these recommendations appear as wishful thinking, almost as blurgs, pathetic nonsense reserved for the use of gogos
If even honesty was rewarded…
But there is no question of the reward under the SERPs are tamped results usurped by various manoeuvres.
Some do not hesitate to say that the deception is even rewarded.
And what is certain is that the sites are being penalized transparent.
So what?
What can we think of this divide between what the drivers claim and the results they deliver?
Either it is incompetence, or it is… incompetence.
Parcequ’on refuses to imagine that they knowingly reward perversity and cheating at the same time they penalize honesty.
Not true that refuses to that?
I have tried to understand a little why this incompetence.
I think I have found in the phenomena occurring in the operation of very large database.
You should know, as a prerequisite, that processors make mistakes.
Not often, but it happens.
Once every x billion operations, it happens that 1 +1 does not deliver 2 but something else - not always the same else, otherwise it would be quickly resolved.
A four billion operations per second to multiply by what? One million servers?
There are inevitably make mistakes.
And this without counting the purely physical hazards (such as electricity, for example), algos evil fichus (pronounced improving constantly), or bugs, or tests that go wrong.
When we accept the limits of computers and that consideration is the stress under which submitted the simulated neural network engine, it is understandable that the engine pedal sometimes sauerkraut.
As long as the computer has not surpassed the quantum, and it is not for tomorrow, it will remain in the unpredictable results.
From surprising! The amazing! From Special!
There will of injustice, too.
But only dreamers ask Justice, realistic request that the injustice is working to their advantage and they deploy their efforts in this direction.
What is annoying is that the engines operate on the old computer into believing that this is the top of the art.
Their equipment bazaar, which is certainly the best in their capabilities, is unable to properly handle the immensity of the ocean documents from the Web.
From there to make people believe that they dominate the issue, there is a very large gap.
And it is propaganda, it is misleading.
Saying it done our best is not enough.
They would do better to remain silent or to say it dominates anything and indeed less.
At a minimum, it should be that the results are improving noticeably.
The results of the Exchange does NOT for most webmasters:)
However, I see no improvement in searches as the months pass.
Of course, I can see other than satisfaction surveys.
The growth in Internet users satisfaction means nothing, it may find its roots as much in a real improvement in addiction to mediocrity.
The satisfaction is a matter of subjectivity, therefore… propaganda.
They are accustomed to declare contents:)
It’s packaging that increases the tolerance for mediocrity.
But if there were only this, it does not deserve a ticket.
What is particularly annoying is that the engines are not even able to make respect their recommendations.
And I have a pretty lie to people.
I have enough sites to advocate free from any hint by saying you will be rewarded.
Because even an eight-year-old kid can see that this is false, it suffices to consider the best results on some queries.
Accordingly, j’arrête charges in the naïve optimism, I am not paid to make people believe that virtue is rewarded in this world of rats.
And nobody could pay me quite expensive, even in stock options three-digit unit, so that I agree to knowingly lie:)
The computer is an idiot who will soon someone said.
Apparently, even assisted by a battalion of quality human brains, an engine is not better.
One can therefore tease.
The search send the key to the firing range:)
It is a blonde, the engine:)
This blog will mutate, his tone will mutate into spending at canaillou futile, we will return to a more realistic view of the situation.
Stay tuned, get physical!
PS: Another one of those tickets that I could divide into three…
Fortunately, I have no need for productivity…
And roll youth!
PS 2: This ticket was written under the influence music
The Eliminator (ZZ Top, 1983, not a ride). Go, Sunday: Videoclip.

Son Yorumlar